The Two Temples
(A Christian Workbook)

Section 2: Chapter 5 – Mortar: Agreement

ust as the way that we individually view the world shapes our personal experiences in this life (see Section 1: Chapter 5), so the way we view the world as a collective Body shapes our experiences as a Church, and determines the direction we walk as a people. The means by which a set of individuals can function together, and possess the same goals and values is through the principle of agreement. While the importance of agreement in accomplishing any project is demonstrated in every aspect of life, it finds no more eloquent advocate than the words of the Scriptures. It is written, “Can two walk together, except they be agreed?” (Amos 3:3) With these simple words Amos points out an enduring truth.

When the judge Samson wished to destroy the harvest of his Philistine enemies, he used a clever method to do so. We are told, “And Samson said concerning them, ‘Now shall I be more blameless than the Philistines, though I do them a displeasure.’ And Samson went and caught three hundred foxes, and took firebrands, and turned tail to tail, and put a firebrand in the midst between two tails. And when he had set the brands on fire, he let them go into the standing corn of the Philistines, and burnt up both the shocks, and also the standing corn, with the vineyards and olives.” (Judges 15:3-5)

Foxes are very fast animals, and it has been pointed out that Samson had to have been very clever, very fast, or the recipient of a miracle, to catch three hundred of them. If he had merely tied a firebrand to each fox’s tail, there would have been little chance for complete destruction of the heathen crops. The animals would merely have fled the area as quickly as they could, and set fire to the land around them. But by tying the fire between the tails of the creatures Samson ensured that they would not be able to agree on a direction to run, each trying to get as far from the fire behind it as quickly as possible. Because of this, he was able to let them go “into the standing corn,” and was assured that they would remain there in a confused panic until the foliage was properly consumed.

If humans attempt to work together, but have a poor concept of agreement, much destruction likewise results. If members of a Church do this, the very harvest is in danger of fiery desolation. Christians have a job to do, a sacred responsibility given to us from Heaven, for Yah desires to work through us for the ingathering of His people. He said to us, “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.” (Mark 16: 15, 16) This great work was not committed unto angels, but unto men who have had the experience of being redeemed by the blood of Yahshua, and can therefore speak from their hearts and their history.

But what results if there is no agreement among those who claim to have the truth? This can be seen most dramatically when we are considering different denominations and faiths. The great song of the atheist and skeptic, when casting contempt upon those who profess association with the Messiah is that “there are all these different churches, all claiming to be right.” The unbelievers are not to be blamed for this particular observation, because they see that there is no agreement.

Yet even within a single organization claiming to be of the Way, this lesson must be well learned. Paul asks, “whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?” (1 Corinthians 3:3) When some of the angels came out of agreement with the Throne of the Most High, there was a separation between those who remained faithful and those who did not. It is exactly the same way among men. John writes of some who would no longer agree with the teachings of the apostles, “Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time. They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.” (1 John 2:18, 19)

In John’s day deceptions were seeping into the Church of Yahshua. Indeed, they had begun long before, and Paul was quick to warn the elders of the congregation at Ephesus that, “after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.” (Acts 20:29) Those who accepted the false teachings began to spread the deceptions and subtle errors among the sheep of the spiritual pasture, and the apostles were quick to counter the mistakes. John’s letter reveals to us that those who would not agree with the apostles’ teachings did not long remain in the Church, but left to draw disciples after themselves, and to reveal to all the world that they were not in harmony with the ones who received the instruction of Christ Himself.

If those who had received the faulty gospel had been humble, they could have been shown the errors in a way that would have made sense to their minds, and been confirmed by their spirits. Solomon counsel us, “Hear instruction, and be wise, and refuse it not.” (Proverbs 8:33) If someone has the testimony of Yahshua, and walks according to the light he has, do not refuse to hear him when he speaks. Healing is possible among the humble, but “Yah resisteth the proud,” as it is written in James 4:6 and confirmed by the experiences of those early days.

Handling disagreements is a key to unity, the subject of the next chapter, and it is a process that is well taught in the words of the Bible. The biggest obstacle to coming into agreement is that which we have been examining: the Teraphim, the household gods. Our last few chapters have described them and explained how to uncover them, and now we see the importance of being clean from these mental and spiritual idols. The ones who left the Church as John records had made an idol of their own understanding, their own doctrines. Amazingly, despite the fact that the apostles, who were in the best possible position to know the truth, opposed them, they stubbornly resisted submission to their judgment. While the traditions of men are in opposition to the Divinely inspired truths, (Mark 7:8) the traditions of the apostles were founded in the teachings and example of Christ, and are to be trusted. (2 Thessalonians 2:15)

We have already seen, in previous chapters, the “Gospel Order” for handling disagreements, and it is worth examining that passage again. It is found here, “Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother. But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.” (Mathew 18:15-17)

There are three stages to this process outlined in the passage. First, go by yourself to the one with whom you have disagreement. If that does not work, take a witness or two. If that does not work, as a last resort bring it to public attention. We find the graciousness of our Father revealed in these steps. He would have us attempt to establish an agreement amongst ourselves with as few others involved as possible. What began as a private matter is best settled as a private matter, and it is always a shame when others must become involved.

Just as mortar between the stones of a building holds the bricks in place, and causes them to fit together perfectly even if the edges are not yet fully worn smooth, so agreement between two individuals causes them to be able to work together as one, even though they have different minds, opinions, and individual preferences. The Messiah applies this not only to those of the same faith, but to anyone at all. He says, “Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison.” (Matthew 5:25) Even when dealing with those who actively seek to do us harm, if we agree with them in all we are able without compromising principle, we will avoid much unnecessary strife.

Paul writes, “Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men. Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for it is written, ‘“Vengeance is mine; I will repay,” saith Yah.’ Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head. Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.” (Romans 12:17-21)

Take note of both the wording of Paul, and the words I have used. The apostle writes, “if it be possible,” do this, and I pointed out that we must agree with people “without compromising principle.” There is a place for disagreement, although it may unfortunately lead to separation. The apostles wrote of this subject as well, for it was far too important to leave to human opinion. They gave examples such as this: “A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject, knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.” (Titus 3:10, 11)

In another place Paul writes, “I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators: Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world. But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.” (1 Corinthians 5:9-11) It is far better to have an open disagreement that others can see, than to have one claiming to be in unity with you yet actively opposing your purposes. Solomon writes, “Open rebuke is better than secret love.” (Proverbs 27:5)

This, of course, will not occur for any real length of time in the Spiritual Temple, but it will certainly happen between those of the faith and those who would tear it down. Paul asks the churches, “And what agreement hath the temple of Yah with idols? For ye are the temple of the living God; as Yah hath said, ‘I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their Almighty, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate,’ saith Yah, ‘and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, and will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters,’ saith Yahweh Almighty.’” (2 Corinthians 6:16-18) We cannot claim to be in agreement with those whose understanding of Yah, and His purpose for our lives, are in opposition to our own. From such we are separate by the very nature of our beliefs, yet within the family of the Holy One these things cannot be.

The witnesses against Christ were known to be false, because “their witness agreed not together.” (Mark 14:56) If the witnesses FOR Christ do not agree, they will be known to be false for exactly the same reasons. The Master prayed for His disciples “that they may be one,” as we will examine in further detail next chapter. But the way in which this unity is accomplished is by coming into agreement. When we can agree on our purpose, when we stand on the same foundation and are heading for the same goals, then we come into unity.

“Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. Again I say unto you, That if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven.” (Matthew 18:18, 19) This passage follows on the heels of the Gospel order presented above, and with reason. Christ explains to His followers the great power that agreement gives to the converts. The prayer of a single man is enough to produce great miracles. It is written that “Elijah was a man subject to like passions as we are, and he prayed earnestly that it might not rain: and it rained not on the earth by the space of three years and six months.” (James 5:17)

Yes, where necessary a single man can accomplish the will of the Almighty. Yet He is pleased to have His people join their petitions together. A sick person is not encouraged to find a single Church member to pray for him, but rather, “let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord.” (James 5:14) The Bible advises us, “let us walk by the same rule [of faith], let us mind the same thing.” (Philippians 3:16) “Let us hold fast our profession.” (Hebrews 4:14b) “Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need.” (Hebrews 4:16) In all these things, we are told, let us agree.

For a final example on the importance of agreement, we must consider the character of our Creator Himself. What importance does He place on agreement? If we can understand this, and grasp it with our hearts, our way cannot but be straight before Him. In this we become like Him, in that we will be obeying this commandment to seek agreement, not because He instructed us to do so, but because (as in all things) it is a part of who He is, and thus shared with us for our edification, our growth, our very lives.

We began this series of studies looking at the Egyptian monarch, and his reaction when Moses came to him and demanded in the name of Yahweh, “Let my people go.” Some have asked, and the question is a good one, “Why did not Yah simply take His people? Why did He send Moses to Pharaoh in the first place, when He could have commanded the Israelites to leave, and could have protected them from the king’s army?”

The answer is, “Because of agreement.” Even when the Almighty goes to the extreme of constraining someone, forcing them to perform an action due to an overwhelming need on the part of His elect, He always seeks to obtain as much agreement from all parties as possible. While Yah is Sovereign, He has an incredible and almost inexplicable respect for the freedom He has given His created beings. From man He desires love, and thus He has created us with the ability to choose. “Where the Spirit of Yah is, there is liberty,” we are told, (2 Corinthians 3:17) and it is only in that atmosphere of liberty that we may truly choose to love.

Yah desired that Pharaoh let the Israelites go. His will would not be restrained by the course of one arrogant human, of course, and so the Almighty sent steadily increasing plagues in an attempt to convince the heathen monarch of His power, giving him an opportunity at every step to bow to the One infinitely greater than himself. This is in line with the Gospel Order, an attempt to cause as small a stir as possible. Yet “Pharaoh hardened his heart,” (Exodus 8:32) and because it was at Yah’s plagues, and because it was allowed by Heaven, it is also written that “Yahweh hardened the heart of Pharaoh.” (Exodus 9:12) Both are true, yet we see from the actions of both parties that while the decrees of the Almighty were those that caused the heart to be hardened, it was the king’s own choices that ultimately led to his rejection of the Spirit of grace.

This is an important teaching to understand, that Yah takes responsibility for the decisions of others to some degree, and the wording of the Scriptures supports this. Yet it must not be thought that any human beings are forced by a Holy God to sin, or to reject the Author of Life. The “vessels of wrath fitted to destruction,” (Romans 9:22) those who will ultimately be lost, are so fitted because of their own choices, for they reject the “much longsuffering” (same verse) of the loving Father who sought to bring them into agreement while it was yet day.

The reason why the Creator did not destroy Lucifer the instant he sinned was because He desired the entire universe to understand the true results of transgression before it was removed, so that it would never rise again. It must be understood, and agreed upon, by the entire universe that Yah is not an arbitrary Lawmaker. He does not command obedience at a whim, but rather has set the laws of the universe in place. They are perfect laws for created beings, and those who obey them will live while those who reject them will necessarily die. Though Yah knows the end from the beginning, He is sensitive to the fact that WE do not; while He would have every right to command and perform, for love’s sake He brings us into agreement before He works.

Of those who are finally destroyed because of sin, even of those who are lost in the day of judgment, Yah brings them into agreement. It is written, “‘As I live,’ saith Yahweh, ‘every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.’” (Romans 14:11) And to Christ, the Judge on that day, “at the name of Yahshua every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Yahshua the Messiah is Lord, to the glory of Yah the Father.” (Philippians 2:10, 11) When every soul sees the beginning, sees his transgression in light of the opportunities he was offered to live, sees his rejection of the infinite sacrifice of the Messiah, then he will understand the mercy and justice of the Throne.

Their agreement will be a forced one, as was the agreement of Pharaoh in Egypt, yet it will be agreement nonetheless, for who can speak against the wisdom of One who knows all things? But a better thing remains for we who are saved, for the time remains that man may agree with Yah freely and in peace, and accept healing, and we are become ministers of that great blessing, that great truth.

Yet while we take this message to the world, we are aware that in Christ our agreement has begun at home, in the Spirit Temple. If there is no agreement there, we will have no safe place into which we may bring converts. Yahshua said to the Hebrews of a divided and worsening system, “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.” (Mathew 23:15) May that never be said of us, for “if a kingdom be divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand. And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.” (Mark 3:24, 25) This is never more true than when it is applied to the Spiritual House. Let us not end up as foxes with burned tails, and no beautiful Harvest to take to the Master. Let us agree.

Quotations:
Agreement brings man into harmony with Yah:
“A covenant is an agreement by which parties bind themselves and each other to the fulfillment of certain conditions. Thus the human agent enters into agreement with God to comply with the conditions specified in His Word. His conduct shows whether or not he respects these conditions.” [God’s Amazing Grace, page 158]

“To them that believe, Christ is precious. His Spirit moving upon the mind and heart of the believer is in perfect agreement with that which is written in the Word. The Spirit and the Word agree perfectly. Thus the Spirit beareth witness with our spirit that we are born of God.” [In Heavenly Places, page 144]

“God has commanded us, ‘Ye shall be holy; for I the Lord your God am holy;’ and an inspired apostle declares that without holiness ‘no man shall see the Lord.’ Holiness is agreement with God. By sin the image of God in man has been marred and well-nigh obliterated; it is the work of the gospel to restore that which has been lost; and we are to cooperate with the divine agency in this work. And how can we come into harmony with God, how shall we receive His likeness, unless we obtain a knowledge of Him? It is this knowledge that Christ came into the world to reveal unto us.” [Lift Him Up, page 279]

Agreement brings man into harmony with man:
“Upon the virtue of Christ’s sacrifice for us we are all agreed. His prayer for us is that we may be made perfect in one. Shall we not, by obeying His word, make it possible for God to answer this prayer?” [The Signs of the Times, November 26, 1902]

“In every place where there are two or three that love God, and keep his commandments, they should speak often one to another of the blessed hope, and should unite their prayers at the throne of grace. God will listen to their humble petitions. He will register their names in his book, and will preserve them in the hour of trial and temptation. Frequently these little meetings are precious occasions. Jesus has promised, ‘Where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.’ And if they ‘shall agree on earth as touching anything that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven.’” [Second Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, October 14, 1884]

“Unless sanctified, soul, body, and spirit, man will be in danger of manifesting an unkindly spirit toward his brother who does not agree with his ideas. There is no such narrowness with God.” [Manuscript Releases Volume Twelve, page 372]

The principle of agreement allows unity without dictatorship:
“I have seen many families shipwrecked through overmanagement on the part of their head, whereas through consultation and agreement all might have moved off harmoniously and well.” [The Adventist Home, page 310]

“If a man is sanguine of his own powers and seeks to exercise dominion over his brethren, feeling that he is invested with authority to make his will the ruling power, the best and only safe course is to remove him, lest great harm be done, and he lose his own soul, and imperil the souls of others. ‘All ye are brethren.’” [Christian Leadership, page 35]

“It is right for the workers to counsel together as brethren; but that man who endeavors to lead his fellow workers to seek his individual counsel and advice regarding the details of their work, and to learn their duty from him, is in a dangerous position and needs to learn what responsibilities are really comprehended in his office. God has appointed no man to be conscience for his fellowman. It is not wise to lay so much responsibility upon an officer that he will feel that he is forced to become a dictator.” [Testimonies to Ministers and Gospel Workers, page 477]

Agreement is necessary for the success of the Great Commission:
“The disciples had just been disputing as to who should be the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. They could not agree. One would claim the honor for himself; another for himself. None of the disciples were in a proper frame of mind to comprehend the significance of coming events, or to appreciate the solemnity of the present occasion. They were not prepared to participate in the Passover Supper.” [Reflecting Christ, page 261]

“Perfect agreement should exist in the plans laid for the publication of our books and periodicals, that the light which they contain may be quickly carried everywhere, to the nominal churches and to the world. Much more should have been accomplished in the sale of our books than we see accomplished today.” [Counsels to Writers and Editors, page 143]

“In union there is strength; in disunion there is weakness. God’s chosen ones are to reveal to the world their union one with another. It is not possible for a few to walk to heaven alone because they can agree with no others. God’s people are to be a unit. If some entertain ideas so peculiar that others cannot accept them, they should compare notes in a teachable spirit, and all should be willing to learn. They should make the most strenuous efforts to be one, to come into the unity of the faith in the bonds of peace.” [Advent Review and Sabbath Herald, April 27, 1897]

Questions:
1) Can I think of examples in the Bible where two people (one of the faith and one not of the faith) disagreed with each other? How was the matter resolved?

2) Can I think of examples in the Bible where two people (both of the common faith) disagreed with each other? How was the matter resolved?

3) How do I deal with a situation in which I find myself disagreeing with what someone is saying?

4) How do I handle it when someone approaches me and indicates that he/she does not agree with me?

5) Do I make it a habit to “get support” for myself before presenting a troubling issue to the person it most directly involves?

6) Do I feel I have suffered a loss when I agree with someone?

7) Do I feel I have suffered a loss when I come into agreement with Yah?

8) Do I always look for the blessing in unpleasant situations, agreeing with Yah that whatsoever circumstances occur were allowed by Him for some purpose?

9) How do I feel when I cannot convince someone that I am correct?

10) Do I ask others for help when I need it?

11) Do I ever compromise my principles in an effort to agree with anyone?

12) Would I be comfortable if someone else had to compromise his/her principles to agree with me?

Exercise:
After contemplating and, if possible, discussing with others the above questions, find a verse or passage of the Bible that gives a promise or an answer for each.

Back   


Back to Main
Back to Contents
Back to Book Index

   Next